U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the next Supreme Court justice, is under heavy criticism from those on the left. Which has many people on the right believing the president made the right pick. Granted, Trump probably could have nominated Thurgood Marshall and taken heat from liberals who believe the court is already too male dominated. But what really scares those on the left is the thought of another justice who supports religious freedom when such cases come before the court. Justin Walker, writing at National Review, said Kavanaugh has a long history of supporting religious freedom. “Kavanaugh has been a steadfast and fearless supporter of religious liberty for decades,” Walker wrote. “When he was in private practice in the 1990s, he chaired the Federalist Society’s Religious Liberty practice group and worked pro bono on cases defending religious freedom. He wrote pro bono amicus briefs defending religious believers in high-profile Supreme Court cases. He represented a synagogue pro bono in a local zoning dispute. He advocated for the selection of judges who protect religious liberty. TRENDING: Horrific Snake Swims into Booby Trap Inches Before Clamping Jaws Around Live Chicken “And as a judge, his record of defending religious liberty is unparalleled,” Walker added. First Liberty Institute president and CEO Kelly Shackleford penned an Op-Ed for FoxNews.com that also lauded Kavanaugh’s defense of religious liberty. “His opinions have consistently adhered to our founding principles that government exists to protect the God-given rights of the people and that the Constitution exists to prevent government from infringing on the rights it is entrusted to defend,” Shackleford said. In writing a dissenting opinion for Priests for Life v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — a petition the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit refused to hear in 2015 — Kavanaugh cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case demanding employers pay for birth control for employees as part of the Obamacare mandate. Kavanaugh wrote that the contraceptive regulations stipulated in Obamacare “substantially burden the religious organizations’ exercise of religion because the regulations require the organizations to take an action contrary to their sincere religious beliefs.” In a statement that can have impacts for cases beyond the Hobby Lobby ruling, such as the mandate that Christian business owners be compelled to provide services to same-sex weddings, Kavanaugh added that “judicially second-guessing the correctness or reasonableness (as opposed to the sincerity) of plaintiffs’ religious beliefs is exactly what the Supreme Court in Hobby Lobby told us not to do.” He has also written in defense of the unborn in matters related to abortion. Last year, Kavanaugh wrote a dissenting opinion in a case in which the appellate court ruled an illegal immigrant teenage girl had the right to obtain an abortion. “The government has permissible interests in favoring fetal life, protecting the best interests of a minor, and refraining from facilitating abortion,” Kavanaugh wrote. He added that the Supreme […]
- Advertisement -
Dive Brief: A recent study from DuPont Nutrition & Health found that 52% of U.S. consumers are eating more plant-based foods and they believe...